Home Visitation and Its Effects on Learners Behavior at Mabini District, Bohol

Authors

  • Marilow Saavedra Abaca Integrated School, Abaca, Mabini, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37034/residu.v2i3.182

Keywords:

Common Misbehavior of The Learners, Mean Percentage Score, Action Plan, Performance Level, Teacher

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of home visitation on learner’s behavior in Abaca Elementary School in Mabini, Bohol. The subjects of the study were the kindergarten pupils of the said schools and evaluations focusing on the learner’s manifested behaviors were collected based on their respective parent’s perception and observations throughout the whole three quarters of the school year. The samples were clustered in to two groups: first group with no home visitation applied and the second group where home visitation was employed. Applying appropriate statistical treatments on the data collected, home visitation was found to have a significantly positive effect on the development and progress of the behavior of the learners as compared to the learner’s where home visitation was not employed. It was recommended that a fairly adequate and regular home visitation must be executed by teachers in every alternate quarter within the school year. A firming parent behavior also is contributor to the success of the whole visit conduct and facilitates the easier flow of the planned activities. Collaborative procedures are executed to ensure that all measures taken in this research yields benefits for the improvement of the learner’s behavior and greater chances of decreasing the misbehavior being exhibit by this learner. At the last part of this paper, a proposed home visitation module was also developed and formulated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Departement of Education Philipines. (2019). Omnibus Policy on Kindergarten Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/DO_s2016_47.pdf

Pianta, R. C., Cox, M. J., Taylor, L., & Early, D. (1999). Kindergarten teachers' practices related to the transition to school: Results of a national survey. The Elementary School Journal, 100(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1086/461944

Stetson, R., Stetson, E., Sinclair, B., & Nix, K. (2012). Home Visits: Teacher Reflections about Relationships, Student Behavior, and Achievement. Issues in Teacher Education, 21(1), 21-37.

Canary, D. J., & Dainton, M. (Eds.). (2003). Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations. Routledge.

Basnyat, S. (2023). Parental Involvement on Home Schooling of Basic Level Children in Nepal. Educational Journal, 2(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.3126/ej.v2i2.61701

Clarke, B. L., Sheridan, S. M., & Woods, K. E. (2010). Elements of healthy family-school relationships. In Handbook of school-family partnerships (pp. 61-79). Routledge.

Whyte, K. L., & Karabon, A. (2016). Transforming teacher–family relationships: Shifting roles and perceptions of home visits through the funds of knowledge approach. Early Years, 36(2), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1139546

Ihmeideh, F., & Oliemat, E. (2015). The effectiveness of family involvement in early childhood programmes: perceptions of kindergarten principals and teachers. Early Child Development and Care, 185(2), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.915817

West, J. M. (2000). Increasing Parent Involvement for Student Motivation.

Peabody, E. P. (1887). Education in the Home, the Kindergarten, and the Primary School. Swan Sonnenschein.

Broström, S. (2002). Communication and continuity in the transition from kindergarten to school. In Transitions in the early years (pp. 76-87). Routledge.

Dahlberg, G., & Moss, P. (2004). Ethics and politics in early childhood education. Routledge.

Kraft-Sayre, M. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2000). Enhancing the Transition to Kindergarten: Linking Children, Families, & Schools.

Mapp, K. L., & Kuttner, P. J. (2013). Partners in Education: A Dual Capacity-Building Framework for Family-School Partnerships. Sedl.

Hirshberg, D., Huang, D. S. C., & Fuller, B. (2005). Which low-income parents select child-care?: Family demand and neighborhood organizations. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(10), 1119-1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.12.029

Miller, C. B. (2014). Character and moral psychology. OUP Oxford.

Thornton, S., & Kilbert, G. (1997). California strategic plan for parental involvement. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.

Cassity, J., & Harris, S. (2000). Parents of ESL students: A study of parental involvement. NASSP Bulletin, 84(619), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650008461906

Parental Involvement in Education. (1999). The importance of parent involvement. https://bit.ly/2CL6LzZ. Date accessed January 21, 2019

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 2 U.S.C. § 6319. (2002). https://bit.ly/2HzwDTh.

Franklin, C., Harris, M. B., & Allen-Meares, P. (Eds.). (2008). The school practitioner's concise companion to preventing dropout and attendance problems. Oxford University Press, USA.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-09

How to Cite

Saavedra, M. (2024). Home Visitation and Its Effects on Learners Behavior at Mabini District, Bohol. Journal of Research and Investigation in Education, 2(3), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.37034/residu.v2i3.182

Issue

Section

Articles