The Level of Effectiveness of The Utilized Self-Learning Modules (SLMS) in Teaching Science to Senior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37034/residu.v1i2.15Keywords:
Effectiveness, Utilized Self-Learning Modules (SLMS), Phenomena, Teaching Science, Senior High SchoolAbstract
Education plays a vital role in contemporary world to succeed. It is important because it is used to alleviate most of the challenges faced in life. This study aimed to determine the level of effectiveness of the utilized self-learning modules in teaching science to Senior High School students in the Schools Division of Zambales. This research paper utilized the quantitative descriptive survey research design. As a master plan specifying the methods and procedures for collection and analyzing the needed information, the descriptive method of research involves the description, of composition or the process of phenomena. The self-learning modules evaluated by the respondents were effective in assessing students’ performance in science. Assessment of the level of effectiveness of the utilized self-learning modules’ was not influenced by the respondents’ Highest Educational Attainment, Area of Specialization, Teaching position, and Length of service in teaching but only by the number of modules writing seminars/training they have attended. There is no significant difference in the level of effectiveness of the utilized SLM when responses are grouped according to learning components, learning goals, and learning competency but there is a significant difference when it comes to the number of trainings they attended.
Downloads
References
Roheli, R., Rahayu, D. A., Marcha, F., & Darmayanto, D. (2023). Implementation of Android-Based English Application System as Learning Tool for 6-12 Years Old Due to Covid-19. Research and Investigation in Education, 1(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.37034/residu.v1i1.4
Llewellyn, D. (2013). Inquire within: Implementing inquiry-and argument-based science standards in grades 3-8. Corwin press.
Callahan, B. E., & Dopico, E. (2016). Science teaching in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9703-7.
Chavan, R. (2013). Difficulties encountered by science teachers during teaching concepts of science. In National Conference on challenges in teacher education.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Sejpal, K. (2013). Modular method of teaching. International Journal for Research in Education, 2(2), 169-171.
Rufii, R. (2015). Developing module on constructivist learning strategies to promote students' independence and performance. International Journal of Education, 7(1), 18.
Yamagishi, K., Sañosa, A. R., de Ocampo, M., & Ocampo, L. (2021). Strategic marketing initiatives for small co-operative enterprises generated from SWOT-TOWS analysis and evaluated with PROMETHEE-GAIA. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 9(2), 100149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2021.100149
Montero-Odasso, M. M., Kamkar, N., Pieruccini-Faria, F., Osman, A., Sarquis-Adamson, Y., Close, J., ... & Kobusingye, O. (2021). Evaluation of clinical practice guidelines on fall prevention and management for older adults: a systematic review. JAMA network open, 4(12), e2138911-e2138911. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524733
Bago, A. L. (2001). Curriculum development: the Philippine experience. De La Salle University Press.
Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business research methods. Cengage learning.
Evans, P. K., McAlister-Shields, L., Manuel, M., Stokes, D. W., Nguyen, H., & Craig, C. J. (2021). Examining the Impact of Informal Experiences on Preservice Teachers' Self-efficacy. In Preparing Teachers to Teach the STEM Disciplines in America’s Urban Schools (Vol. 35, pp. 85-108). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(6), 1423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423.
Abbott, R. Dr Angus Bell. Physical Review Letters Phys Rev Lett, 125(10), 101102.
Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it's here to stay. Corwin Press.
Corpuz, B. B., Salandanan, G. G., & Rigor, D. V. (2006). Principles of teaching 2. Lorimar Publishing.
Dizon, J. P. M. (2021). Protecting the university, policing race: A case study of campus policing. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000350
Chang, C. H., & Pascua, L. (2017). The curriculum of climate change education: A case for Singapore. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(3), 172-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1289883
Deliquiña, M. J., & de Guzman, M. F. D. (2021). Differentiated Instructions in the Kto12 Social Studies Program and Students’ Academic Performance. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 5.
Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Brush, T. A., Aslan, S., & Zachmeier, A. (2018). Addressing technology integration concerns: Asynchronous video mentoring between pre-service teachers and exemplary technology-using in-service teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3246
Jehanzeb, K., & Bashir, N. A. (2013). Training and development program and its benefits to employee and organization: A conceptual study. European Journal of business and management, 5(2). 243-253.
Majeed, A., & Shakeel, S. (2017). Importance of training and development in the workplace. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 8(4), 498-504.
Funa, A., & Talaue, F. (2021). Constructivist learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Investigating students’ perceptions of biology self-learning modules. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(3), 250-264.
Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70. DOI: 10.9790/7388-05616670.
